Monday, 16 January 2017

Gender "identity" and the diabolical reality behind Pope Bergoglio's Tweets


What you see above, is a picture of the Twitter page of Pope Francis from earlier today. At the time, over 15,000 people "loved" this Tweet and another 6,000 shared it. They were terribly deceived by its content. They were misled of the Truth. 

What is wrong then with this "Tweet" of the Vicar of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Bishop of Rome, Pope Francis?

The statement may be someones opinion, it may be his, but it is a lie.

It should have read.

There can never be true peace as long as a single human being is violated by not being preached the Truth of salvation by Our Lord Jesus Christ and baptism by water into the Catholic Church.

Let us put aside then, the truth of my statement, above, and deal with what the Pope has Tweeted, and then, let us discuss his Tweets in general.

This statement, that only there can "never be true peace" if someone has been "violated in his or her personal identity," is so bizarre and so embracing of a radical, secular narrative and mindset as to be diabolical. 

"There can never be true peace as long as a single human being is violated in his or her own personal identity."

In this day and age, "violated in his or her personal identity" can only be interpreted in one way, and that is radical gender theory and ideology. It is not good enough that this Bergoglio in some speech condemns genderism and then Tweets out such misleading and diabolical statements such as this which support genderist ideology. 

Are we to think now that this Pope supports the mental disorder that is personal identification of some kind of gender identity outside of biology? It is a mental disorder, notwithstanding what sociologists and politicians and Marxists demand, it is not, nor can it ever be, based upon science. It is a lie. The question here is, why is the Pope promoting it on Twitter when he has previously condemned gender ideology?

The photo above is from "All Inclusive Ministries" a group of homosexuals and lesbians operating out of Our Lady of Lourdes parish in Toronto, administered of course, by Jesuits. So distorted are they and so mislead, they can actually pen a post called "Lord, I Am Worthy." This is what Bergoglio has done and not only here in Toronto with this group, these types of suffering and misguided souls are everywhere, but this is what he has done. He speaks of "peripheries" of meeting people where they are. Well, it is one thing to meet them in the "dunghill" but at some point, as the Psalmist says, they need to "lifted out of the mire."

How long now until some group uses this evil Tweet for their own purpose, even if it is not what he meant?

Now, is there something which I am missing? If so, then what does the Pope mean, exactly? Frankly, I don't think I am missing anything. I think this is connected deeply to the next Synod and setting the scene for the "youth" who will corrupt the Synod and be corrupted by it. This Tweet was intentional. The Vatican offices, of both clerics and lay, are overrun with people who have no faith, ill-formed faith and are on a diabolical mission to change the faith and therefore, destroy the institutional Church and its unity under Peter. They hate you, they hate me, they hate your children and your grandchildren. They hate the Church and at the very root of all of this is their hatred for Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Mother. 

Let us look at this more broadly.

First, the Pope has no business on Twitter. Not this one, not Benedict XVI. It is a belittling of the office of the Pope, it causes confusion and reduces the papacy and the teaching authority of the pope to trivial. 

Second, who wrote this? Did Jorge Bergoglio sit down this morning and write this out and the Communication office just translated it and Tweeted it out to the various language accounts under Pontifex? Or rather, did the communication office, as I've been told, put various possibilities together and then present the list to him to approve? Or, is there a possibility that he knows nothing about what these people in communications are doing in his name? If that is the case, then this matter is even more serious than the Tweet itself. 

While this writer is under no illusions that Jorge Bergoglio is unfit for the papacy, that his theological underpinnings are poisoned by modernism, false oecumenism and indifferentism, positivism and Marxism and that he is a danger to the Faith, there can be no doubt, that the people around him are sycophantic, manipulative, opportunists, who will stop at nothing to preserve their positions and their power by manipulating a man who on top of those underpinnings already mentioned, is at best, intellectually a simpleton, and at worst and actual enemy of Christ.

Frankly, every one of them, including the bishop in white, have been engaging in a little too much coprophagia.



Is Bishop Gerald Barbarito of the Diocese of Palm Beach the latest in a long list of pervert protectors?

As with Father Matthew Despard in the Diocese of Motherwell, it seems that a priest, who defends the flock from the infiltration of sodomites into the priesthood, is bound to become targeted by his bishop.

Barona reports:
Fr. John Gallagher is a priest of the Diocese of Palm Beach, Florida.
Image result for father john gallagher west palm beachIn January, 2015, Fr. Gallagher caught a visiting priest from India showing homosexual pornography to a 14 year old boy. Fr. Gallagher rightly went straight to the police. 
However, in doing so, this good priest felt the wrath of the local Bishop, Gerald Barbarito. It seems the bishop was not at all happy that Fr. Gallagher had had this vile sodomite arrested. Apparently, the Diocese had preferred to spirit the sodomite out of the country, back to India. Barbarito responded to Fr Gallagher's righteous actions to go straight to the police by releasing his underlings - clerical and lay -in the Diocese to smear the Irish born priest.
Read the rest at Witness.

Click here for the most recent news articles.

UPDATE:

A regular reader has expressed concern in the combox about this story. The diocese apparently rejects the priests contention stating that he did not follow proper protocol and accuses him needing "professional assistance." 


http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/crime--law/diocese-issues-lengthy-defense-whistleblower-claims/w0TkvHBwD9SgLCar74aOPO/

Was the other priest guilty of watching pornography or not?

Did he seduce a young teen to join with him in watching it?

It is not uncommon for the homosexual mafia, rife throughout the dioceses of Florida and its seminary system (remember Favalora?) to target the faithful priest who would dare to out them. 


Sunday, 15 January 2017

A Psalm for the Church persecuted by Her enemies within


Psalm 73 Douay-Rheims  

1 Understanding for Asaph. O God, why hast thou cast us off unto the end: why is thy wrath enkindled against the sheep of thy pasture?

2 Remember thy congregation, which thou hast possessed from the beginning. The sceptre of thy inheritance which thou hast redeemed: mount Sion in which thou hast dwelt.

3 Lift up thy hands against their pride unto the end; see what things the enemy hath done wickedly in the sanctuary.

4 And they that hate thee have made their boasts, in the midst of thy solemnity. They have set up their ensigns for signs,

5 And they knew not both in the going out and on the highest top. As with axes in a wood of trees,

6 They have cut down at once the gates thereof, with axe and hatchet they have brought it down.

7 They have set fire to thy sanctuary: they have defiled the dwelling place of thy name on the earth.

8 They said in their heart, the whole kindred of them together: Let us abolish all the festival days of God from the land.

9 Our signs we have not seen, there is now no prophet: and he will know us no more.
10 How long, O God, shall the enemy reproach: is the adversary to provoke thy name for ever?

11 Why dost thou turn away thy hand: and thy right hand out of the midst of thy bosom for ever?

12 But God is our king before ages: he hath wrought salvation in the midst of the earth.

13 Thou by thy strength didst make the sea firm: thou didst crush the heads of the dragons in the waters.

14 Thou hast broken the heads of the dragon: thou hast given him to be meat for the people of the Ethiopians.

15 Thou hast broken up the fountains and the torrents: thou hast dried up the Ethan rivers.

16 Thine is the day, and thine is the night: thou hast made the morning light and the sun.

17 Thou hast made all the borders of the earth: the summer and the spring were formed by thee.

18 Remember this, the enemy hath reproached the Lord: and a foolish people hath provoked thy name.

19 Deliver not up to beasts the souls that confess to thee: and forget not to the end the souls of thy poor.

20 Have regard to thy covenant: for they that are the obscure of the earth have been filled with dwellings of iniquity.

21 Let not the humble be turned away with confusion: the poor and needy shall praise thy name.

22 Arise, O God, judge thy own cause: remember thy reproaches with which the foolish man hath reproached thee all the day.

23 Forget not the voices of thy enemies: the pride of them that hate thee ascendeth continually.

Saturday, 14 January 2017

Everything is not fine

Pope Francis greets Cardinal Raymond Burke at the Vatican in 2014 (CNS)
“Because everywhere I go — and I travel a lot now — everywhere I go people are saying: 'What's wrong with you Cardinals? There are these serious questions, and yet you remain silent. You don't say anything.'"
“And they’re correct,” he continued. “If we were to remain silent, it would most definitely give the idea to the faithful that everything is fine. But everything is not fine.”



Cardinal Burke is correct. The faithful are exasperated that the Cardinals "remain silent."

Everything is certainly, not fine.

And the fish rots from the head first!




Pro-Abortion Population Control fraud to speak at Vatican Conference - Pope Bergoglio stands by and permits it!

The Devil is in the Church. Satan has seized control of the Church of Christ. Can there be any doubt? 

If Bergoglio were not under the control of the Evil One, would he allow this evil to take place within the Vatican?

No, he would not. Jorge Bergoglio is the Pope. He has the power to stop this. He will not. Just as he will not stop the Maltese bishops from implementing heresy and sacrilege. 

Things are moving swiftly now. There must be a confrontation with this Bergoglio. These Judases all must be confronted. These Judases have betrayed Christ. 

Mock them. 
'
Defy them. 

Call them out as the malefactors they are. 

Do not follow them into perdition.

Stay with Our Lord and His Church in Her suffering. Abandon not Our Mother.  

Call upon the LORD to smite them. To confound them. To convert them or take their last breath away. 

May St. Joseph open their eyes, or close them forever.

Psalm 82 Douay-Rheims  
A canticle of a psalm for Asaph.
2 O God, who shall be like to thee? hold not thy peace, neither be thou still, O God.
3 For lo, thy enemies have made a noise: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.
4 They have taken a malicious counsel against thy people, and have consulted against thy saints.
5 They have said: Come and let us destroy them, so that they be not a nation: and let the name of Israel be remembered no more.
6 For they have contrived with one consent: they have made a covenant together against thee,
7 The tabernacles of the Edomites, and the Ismahelites: Moab, and the Agarens,
8 Gebal, and Ammon and Amalec: the Philistines, with the inhabitants of Tyre.
9 Yea, and the Assyrian also is joined with them: they are come to the aid of the sons of Lot.
10 Do to them as thou didst to Madian and to Sisara: as to Jabin at the brook of Cisson.
11 Who perished at Endor: and became as dung for the earth.
12 Make their princes like Oreb, and Zeb, and Zebee, and Salmana. All their princes,
13 Who have said: Let us possess the sanctuary of God for an inheritance.
14 O my God, make them like a wheel; and as stubble before the wind.
15 As fire which burneth the wood: and as a flame burning mountains:
16 So shalt thou pursue them with thy tempest: and shalt trouble them in thy wrath.
17 Fill their faces with shame; and they shall seek thy name, O Lord.
18 Let them be ashamed and troubled for ever and ever: and let them be confounded and perish.
19 And let them know that the Lord is thy name: thou alone art the most High over all the earth.


From LifeSiteNews:

VATICAN CITY, January 12, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — The Vatican has invited the undisputed father of the modern, pro-abortion population control movement to present a paper at an upcoming Vatican-run conference.
Featured ImageDr. Paul Ehrlich, author of the 1968 bestseller The Population Bomb is scheduled to speak in Vatican City during the February 27-March 1 conference that will discuss “how to save the natural world.” The Stanford biologist champions sex-selective abortion as well as mass forced sterilization as legitimate methods to curb population growth.
In his 1968 book, Ehrlich went so far as to defend forced abortion, writing: “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-invites-pro-abortion-population-bomb-author-to-speak-at-biological

Friday, 13 January 2017

Bergoglio's Maltese Bishops, follow his lead and openly dissent from the Catholic Faith. The proof is here for all to see.

In a stunning report in Osservatore Romano, the Vatican City State's own newspaper, the Bishops of Malta have declared themselves heretics and have placed themselves outside the Holy Catholic Church. There is simply no other way to look at the situation given what they have said.

Below is the head of the Maltese Bishop's Conference, Charles Scicluna. As the video reveals, he sure likes the limelight. A real rock star is the pathetic curse upon the Church, that is this man.



In a statement that will now sanction not only adultery but the open and ongoing sin of sacrilege, the bishops have said that:

“If a separated or divorced person who is living in a new relationship manages, with an informed and enlightened conscience, to acknowledge and believe that he or she are at peace with God, he or she cannot be precluded from participating in the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist”.

They also state that avoiding sex may be "humanly impossible."

A most interesting statement, no doubt, particularly coming from men who are to be not only celibate, but chaste.

Perhaps some of these Maltese bishops speak from experience, eh?

How about some sodomy and play with the girlie-boy down the lane?  Perhaps some Saturday night pornography followed by a flurry of self-abuse?  Maybe the immoral, but natural thing of bedding down for a night with an actual woman! Pfft, a woman - what would these effeminates know about a woman!

After all, if the Bishops of Malta think that it is "humanly impossible" to avoid sexual sin, then they must be speaking from experience and that includes this pathetic Judas, Scicluna!

Here's the whole lot of them, the whole disgraceful mess of apostates!

UPDATE: In spite of complaints from a few, I insist on listing all Maltese bishops here, even those who are Nuncios and who have nothing directly to do with the two bishops from Malta, who have undertaken this. The reason is clear, they must rebuke their brothers!


John Paul II and Benedict XVI reaffirmed the Church’s perennial teaching that divorced and remarried Catholics cannot receive Communion, except possibly when they endeavour to live “as brother and sister."

The fact that this is happening can be lead straight to the feet of Jorge Bergoglio. There can be no holding back now of the four Cardinals, and more still, who are prepared to challenge this wrong-headed, and faithless, scandalous, malefactor on the Seat of Peter. This is his fault. This is Bergoglio's doing. 

Perhaps, just perhaps, the Maltese bishops have done us a big favour. This is going to blow up and put Bergoglio in the corner where he belongs.  Jorge Bergoglio must be held to account for his error and the heretical and sacrilegious  permission in Amoris Laetitia. He did it. This is his work and it must be denounced.

The Pope must recant and repent. If he dies before doing this, his judgement with Our Lord Jesus Christ will be severe.

Read the rest at:

http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2017/01/13/maltas-bishops-tell-the-remarried-take-communion-if-you-feel-at-peace-with-god/

UPDATED:

Dr. Edward Peters, the preeminent Canon Lawyer has already commented. He states that this is even worse than the Argentine statement which left room for "orthodoxy." 

https://canonlawblog.wordpress.com/2017/01/13/the-maltese-disaster/
1. The Maltese bishops have fallen completely for the canonically and ecclesiologically false view that an individual’s assessment of his or her own readiness to receive holy Communion (see c. 916) controls a minister’s decision to administer the sacrament (see c. 915). In Malta now, anyone who approaches for the sacraments should be recognized as being “at peace with God”. Objective evidence to the contrary is simply no longer relevant. Canon 916 is thus eviscerated, Canon 915 is effectively repudiated.
2. The Maltese bishops do not seem to know what the word “conjugal” means. They think that non-married people can practice “conjugal” virtues and that they can decide about whether to engage in “conjugal” acts. Nonsense and, coming from bishops, inexcusable nonsense at that. Non-married people can have sex, of course, but Catholic pastoral integrity does not hold such sexual acts on par with the physically identical, but truly conjugal, acts as performed by married persons.
3. The Maltese bishops, by extending their document to the sacrament of Reconciliation, have basically instructed their priests not to withhold absolution from divorced-and-remarried Catholics who refuse to repent of their “public and permanent adultery” (CCC 2384) even to the point of abstaining from sexual (nb: sexual not “conjugal”) relations. Incredibly, such a directive raises the specter of green-lighting sacrilegious confessions and the commission of solicitation in confession. No priest should want either on his conscience, let alone both.
4. The Maltese bishops even managed to take swipes at Baptism and Confirmation by opening the door to divorced-and-remarried Catholics serving as godparents contrary to the expectations of Canon 874 § 1, 3º. See CLSA New Comm (2001) 1062-1063.


Today, the Baptism of the Lord

Related image
Today, the Octave Day of Epiphany, January 13, it is the Commemoration of the Baptism of the Lord. In the modernist calendar and the nervously disordered liturgy it falls, as you know, on the Sunday after Epiphany or Monday, should Epiphany fall on Sunday or is transferred to It, as it was this past week. The oddity is that in Rome, Epiphany is on January 6 and while much of the rest of the world was on Epiphany "Sunday," Rome was celebrating the Baptism of the Lord. As I wrote, the nervous disordered liturgy.

The Second Sunday after Pentecost, upcoming in the proper calendar and rite, or the Second Sunday in Ordinary Time in Year C of that same disordered liturgy, (I cannot recall the current Year as I've not been to a nervous disordered rite in many months) it is Cana Sunday, when the Gospel read is that of the Wedding Feast of Cana and the changing by our Lord of the water into wine. It is casually plugged in to Year C, whist A and B are different, thus changing the whole liturgical understanding of these days and depriving the faithful and clergy of the deep spiritual richness of the liturgical season.

What do these all have to do with each other?

Up until the sinister Annibale Bugnini had his way with Pius XII, Epiphany had its own Octave. While it was killed off in 1955, remnants of it survived in the 1962 Roman Missal and actually survive in the Lectionary and Responsorial Psalm of the 1970 Missal. It was a grievous error to do away with it over 60 years ago. It should be brought back for both Missals, or at least until the nervous disorder is abrogated, and anathematised, as it will be. In our home, however, we have been celebrating the Octave, as we have been reading the Divine Office of Matins, Lauds and Vespers according to the Divino Afflatu, the pre-Bugnini and uncontaminated Office as reformed by Pope St. Pius X. It is available at the tab above "Divine Office 1962."

Further, the early Fathers of the Church believed that the Epiphany, -- the singular visit of the Wise Men, and, the Baptism of the Lord and the Wedding Feast at Cana occurred on the same date in the respective years of Our Lord's life. The antiphons throughout the week recall this daily.

I wish to point you now from here to a fine blog called The New Theological Movement

It will explain it all and hopefully, bring you to a greater understanding on what was lost in our faith and culture and what we must struggle to restore, in spite of the Vatican and the malefactors who undermined our Faith, the Liturgy and the Culture. This post, at A Catholic Life, looks at some others aspects of the Octaves

When I was a child, my mother always referred to the Epiphany as "Little Christmas." It has always been considered a continuation of Christmas.

Just one more reason to abandon the Novus Ordo and its corrupted calendar and return to the tradition and faith of our fathers. 

Thursday, 12 January 2017

Pope Bergoglio exercises "immediate control" over all Catholics?

Image result for don bergoglio

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- The leadership of the Order of Malta denied the legality of a Vatican investigation into the forced resignation of the group's former grand chancellor, but the commission established by Pope Francis said it "is completely legitimate and authorized" to investigate the matter and inform the pope.
According to one of the legal notes prepared for the commission, the pope's right to be informed of the circumstances surrounding the removal of Albrecht Freiherr von Boeselager relates "to the authority he exercises directly and immediately over all baptized faithful, whether lay or clerical."
http://www.catholicnews.com/services/englishnews/2017/order-of-malta-questions-legitimacy-of-commission-established-by-pope.cfm

"Direct and immediate authority?" which Bergoglio possesses "over all baptised faithful?

What kind of clericalist, fascist idiot would actually write such preposterous thing to the any Catholic, group or individual without clarifying that it begins and ends with doctrine and discipline?

The matter with the Knights of Malta is administrative, not doctrinal. The Pope has no business interfering. Let Rome dare say that "we established" and approved Knight of Malta charter. Well, the Italian Republic approved the treaty creating the Vatican City State too. 

Shall Italy revoke it? 

For more on the Knights of Malta, I direct you to this essay by Dr. Roberto de Mattei, translated at The Eponymous Flower.

A reader has brought to my attention, this, from Denzinger:


If anyone thus speaks, that the Roman Pontiff has only the office of inspection or direction, but not the full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the universal Church, not only in things which pertain to faith and morals, but also in those which pertain to the discipline and government of the Church spread over the whole world; or, that he possesses only the more important parts, but not the whole plenitude of this supreme power; or that this power of his is not ordinary and immediate, or over the churches altogether and individually, and over the pastors and the faithful altogether and individually: let him be anathema.” (Denzinger 1831)

Image result for don bergoglioWell then, careful my fellow Catholics, this Peronist Fascist will soon be declaring his authority over your property and your pension or he will excommunicate you.

These malefactors are nothing more than a bunch of coprophiliacs in clerical dress, if you ask me. 

"Anathema?" Yeah, right. They love the law, these Roman hypocrites - they interpret it for their friends and they apply it to their enemies when it suits them.

Gosh, and he was such a cute kid, too.

The Peronist Pope - Bergoglio ignores his curial experts and his collegial bishops

All the talk about "collegiality" has gone out the window with Jorge Bergoglio. Never would Pope John Paul II or Benedict XVI have ever acted with the near maniacal manner in which this occupant of the Seat of Peter presides over the Holy Catholic Church.

Edward Pentin, truly the most well-informed and respected Vatican journalist today, has reported on Cardinal Gerhard Müller’s recent interview on German television. The Cardinal seems shows his own weakness in being prepared to confront the errors of Bergoglio as is revealed by some of his statements:

His remarks also come after it has emerged the CDF had clear misgivings about the document before it was published — concerns which were never heeded. One informed official recently told the Register that a CDF committee that reviewed a draft of Amoris Laetitia raised “similar” dubia to those of the four cardinals. Those dubia formed part of the CDF’s 20 pages of corrections, first reported by Jean-Marie Genois in Le Figaro on April 7, the eve of the publication of the document.
Another senior official went further, revealing to the Register last week that Cardinal Müller had told him personally that the CDF “had submitted many, many corrections, and not one of the corrections was accepted”. He added that what the cardinal states in the interview “is exactly the contradictory of everything which he has said to me on the matter until now” and he had the “impression of someone who was not speaking for himself but repeating what someone else had told him to say.”

Not only has Bergoglio and the minions surrounding him ignored the Curial department charged with ensuring doctrinal orthodoxy but they he has ignored up to thirty Cardinals and numerous National Conferences of Bishops who have raised legitimate concerns about the matters contained in Amoris Laetitia.

Image result for pope francis angryA significant number of episcopal conferences around the world have expressed their concerns to the Pope, the Register has learned, and like the four cardinals, have received no response. Also before the document was published, 30 cardinals, having seen an advance draft of the apostolic exhortation, wrote to the Pope expressing their reservations, especially on the issue of communion for remarried divorcees, warning that the document would weaken the three essential sacraments of the Church: the Eucharist, marriage, and confession. The Pope never responded to that letter either, a Vatican source told the Register.


Bergoglio's ignoring of both will allow history to declare him "illegitimate."

May that history be written soon.

Jorge Bergoglio: The Great Hypocrite and Pervert Protector

pope-francis_se

Why more and more priests can’t stand Pope Francis
He has been pigeonholed as fearless reformer, but questions are arising about his judgment
By Damian Thompson

On 2 January, the Vatican published a letter from Pope Francis to the world’s bishops in which he reminded them that they must show ‘zero tolerance’ towards child abuse. The next day, the American Week magazine published an article that told the story of ‘Don Mercedes’ — Fr Mauro Inzoli, an Italian priest with a passion for expensive cars and underage boys.

In 2012, Pope Benedict stripped Inzoli of his priestly faculties, effectively defrocking him. In 2014, however, they were restored to him — by Pope Francis, who warned him to stay away from minors.

Then, finally, the Italian civil authorities caught up with this serial groper of teenagers in the confessional. Last summer Inzoli was sentenced to four years and nine months in jail for paedophile offences. The Vatican, under ‘zero-tolerance’ Francis, refused to supply evidence that prosecutors wanted.

If Pope Benedict XVI had displayed such a hypocritical attitude towards a clerical child abuser, the roof would have fallen in on him: he’d have been driven out of office instead of resigning.

...


He is not, however, their instrument. In the words of a Vatican observer who held an important position in Rome for many years, ‘He hasn’t taken on the old progressive mantle so much as created his own personality cult.’ Theological niceties bore him. Personal loyalty obsesses him — ‘and if the cardinal electors had done due diligence they would have discovered that he was an extraordinarily divisive figure among the Argentinian Jesuits’.

...

Read the rest at:

Wednesday, 11 January 2017

Bergoglian Barbarians at the gates of Rome!

A beautiful tradition in Rome has been the extension of the Christmas season until Candlemas on February 2, the Feast of the Presentation of the Lord or the Purification of Mary. In the Fox and Vox homestead, I assure you, the tree is up and well watered, we cut it ourselves in early December and left it in water outside until the 23rd of December, the Mangers are lovingly displayed and all the outside lights still glow on the bushes. They will remain until we come home from church on Candlemas. Since we read the Divine Office according to the pre-1955 Divino Afflatu, we are still basking in the glow of the Octave of Epiphany. What a tragic loss began in that year when Annibale Bugnini began taking advantage of the trust of an every weakening Pius XII and the destruction of the liturgy began.

Though the official liturgical end of Christmas in the Nervous Disordered modernist liturgy, the "banal" and "on the spot product" of deformed Catholic minds, is the end of Vespers of the Baptism of the Lord, the ancient tradition in St. Peter's Square has always been to maintain the Nativity and Christmas Tree until Candlemas.

That ended today.


Barbarians at the gates of Rome.

Will Pope Bergoglio undermine Summorum Pontificum?

On his blog, Settimo Cielo, Sandro Magister today reveals some of the machinations and the identities behind the demand by Bergoglio to terminate certain priests in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2017/01/11/a-firing-a-demolition-behold-the-new-curia/?refresh_ce


Magister goes on to confirm a fear that on the target list next for Pope Bergoglio, through his appointments to the Congregation for Divine Liturgy and Discipline of the Sacraments, is Liturgiam Authenticam.


Want some more?

It is believed that he will undermine Summorum Pontificum. 

Let him try.

I guarantee you this, Father Bergoglio, try it and it will be your Waterloo!




Bergoglio, Schönborn and Spadaro - the Fascist-Masonic Junta that demand you submit!

Image result for spadaro schonborn popeSome make the mistake, often intentionally, that Islam means "peace." It does not. It means submission. The same false religion that spawns such submission is now dominant in our the Church of Christ under the Peronist thug now sitting in the Chair of Peter. Aided and abetted by his mathematically and theologically deficient Jesuitical sycophant. Antonio Spadaro, who is so tough, he blocks people on Twitter, these three amigos, which include the official interpreter of Amoris Laetitia,  Cardinal Schönborn, are ramping up the demand that Catholics submit to their pathetical and filthy heresies.

Submission. 

They want you to believe that the God who created the precise mathematical clock of the universe has lied to you for 2000 years. These men are traitors of Jesus Christ and His Church. Jorge Bergoglio must be resisted and confronted to his face that faithful Catholics will not accept the heretical teachings articulated in Amoris Laetitia and have had enough of his pathetic and near daily insults to the Faith and the faithful.

It is incumbent upon faithful Catholics to resist these men, including Bergoglio. It is absolutely necessary that we do not become silent but in fact, ensure that each of these men know that we resist, that we will continue to resist, we will do it in our lives and families, we will do it our conversations with other Catholics and we will do it on blogs and social media. We will make it abundantly clear to each of them that they will not succeed in this attempt to undermine the Faith. They may betray Christ and His Church, we will not. 

Note that this will make them very, very, very angry and they will come at you and at me. Let them, let them expose themselves for what they are. 

I direct you to this essay by Hilary White on OnePeterFive. It is a must read and deadly accurate assessment of that which we face and must face up to.

http://www.onepeterfive.com/many-fingers-francis-holding-now-amoris-laetitia-submission/

Oh, and a message for Tony Spadaro,Tommy Rosica, Kevin Farrell and the rest of you; you can block on Twitter but it's very easy to take out a second account to follow you and as long as one does not comment or link to those you might have blocked, we can still see your Tweets and PrintScreen them. You're not that smart.


Tuesday, 10 January 2017

Paul of Tarsus or Bergoglio of Buenos Aires

Image result for st paul at corinth

Reading Matins this morning, according to Divino Afflatu for the Fifth Day in the Octave of Epiphany (done away with as an Octave in 1955), we read from the Letter of St. Paul to the Corinthians in three parts. Rather than use the translation from Matins, from the Douay, I will instead use that of the New Revised Standard Version - Catholic Edition. This will then make obvious in the most current way, how clear St. Paul is:

1 Corinthians 5:1-11 New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (NRSVCE)
Sexual Immorality Defiles the Church
5 It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality (the Douay refers to "fornication," the NRSV-CE uses an even broader term with "sexual immorality") among you, and of a kind that is not found even among pagans; for a man is living with his father’s wife. 2 And you are arrogant! Should you not rather have mourned, so that he who has done this would have been removed from among you?
3 For though absent in body, I am present in spirit; and as if present I have already pronounced judgement 4 in the name of the Lord Jesus on the man who has done such a thing. When you are assembled, and my spirit is present with the power of our Lord Jesus, 5 you are to hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord.6 Your boasting is not a good thing. Do you not know that a little yeast leavens the whole batch of dough? 7 Clean out the old yeast so that you may be a new batch, as you really are unleavened. For our paschal lamb, Christ, has been sacrificed. 8 Therefore, let us celebrate the festival, not with the old yeast, the yeast of malice and evil, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.
Sexual Immorality Must Be Judged
9 I wrote to you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral persons— 10 not at all meaning the immoral of this world, or the greedy and robbers, or idolaters, since you would then need to go out of the world. 11 But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother or sister who is sexually immoral or greedy, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or robber. Do not even eat with such a one.

"Do not even eat with such a one!"

So "rigid" was that writer. Such a "self-absorbed, Promethean, neo Pelagian" before Pelagian even existed, was that "tent maker." What a "clericalist" was that student of Gamaliel, considered by the Church to have been a secret Christian and a Saint; in the Martyrology for August 3. His remains are at the Duomo in Pisa, Italy (of "Leaning Tower" fame). Holy Gamaliel is made famous in Acts wherein he says:

The Old Rabbi—Rembrandt
S.Gamaliel by Rembrandt
"I advise you: Leave these men alone! Let them go! For if their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail. But if it is from God, you will not be able to stop these men; you will only find yourselves fighting against God.’ 
For nearly two-thousand years, we have had the words of St. Paul speak clearly and emphatically to us of how to live, how to be moral and upstanding and faithful to Christ. Clearly, the words of the men to whom Holy Gamaliel referred were doing the work, "from God," 

Now, we have moderns who take a position out of some false mercy that is opposite that of Paul. Such a "doctor," he was, a terrible "detached" man with a "clericalist psychology." It is these men, lead by Bergoglio, who are, "fighting against God."

What then, must Pope Bergoglio think of St. Paul, after he reads that passage, from Scripture, (from something other than Divino Afflatu, of course), considering what he said this morning, at the chapel at the Casa Santa Marta?

Pope Francis preaches at the daily Mass at the Casa Santa Marta. - ANSA"Jesus served the people, He explained things because the people understood well: He was at the service of the people. He had an attitude of a servant, and this gave authority. On the other hand, these doctors of the law that the people… yes, they heard, they respected, but they didn’t feel that they had authority over them; these had a psychology of princes: ‘We are the masters, the princes, and we teach you. Not service: we command, you obey.’ And Jesus never passed Himself off like a prince: He was always the servant of all, and this is what gave Him authority."
"They were detached from the people, they were not close [to them]; Jesus was very close to the people, and this gave authority. Those detached people, these doctors, had a clericalist psychology: they taught with a clericalist authority – that’s clericalism. It is very pleasing to me when I read about the closeness to the people the Blessed Paul VI had; in number 48 of Evangelii nuntiandi one sees the heart of a pastor who is close [to the people]: that’s where you find the authority of the Pope, closeness. First, a servant, of service, of humility: the head is the one who serves, who turns everything upside down, like an iceberg. The summit of the iceberg is seen; Jesus, on the other hand, turns it upside down and the people are on top and he that commands is below, and gives commands from below. Second, closeness."
"On the other hand, this people was not coherent and their personality was divided on the point that Jesus counselled His disciples: ‘But, do what they tell you, but not what they do’: they said one thing and did another. Incoherence. They were incoherent. And the attitude Jesus uses of them so often is hypocritical. And it is understood that one who considers himself a prince, who has a clericalist attitude, who is a hypocrite, doesn’t have authority! He speaks the truth, but without authority. Jesus, on the other hand, who is humble, who is at the service of others, who is close, who does not despise the people, and who is coherent, has authority. And this is the authority that the people of God senses."

If Paul was not speaking with "authority" and the authority of Jesus, then who is he that we should consider what he says? Does Bergoglio place himself above St. Paul? We know what Bergoglio is saying in these little diatribes, he refers to faithful Catholics and faithful prelates who dare to stand up for the Truth of Christ and His Church.

Bergoglio speaks frequently about "senses" and "peripheries" and what the "people of God" think. 

Perhaps it is time for Pope Bergoglio to tell the world what God thinks, and the "Catholic God" specifically! Perhaps its time for Bergoglio to smell a little bit more like the incense of heaven rather than the stench of the sheep. Even the sheep like a bath now and then and sweet smelling things. 

After all, the 39th Psalm (Douay numbering) does tell us that:

3 And he heard my prayers, and brought me out of the pit of misery and the mire of dregs. And he set my feet upon a rock, and directed my steps.

There's a little too much wallowing around in the "mire of dregs" and not enough setting of "feet upon the rock," and directly the steps of those in sexual immorality. Those, and we can name many of them within the ranks of Bergoglio's new Cardinals, will rue the day they choose to "accompany." They'll take on more than the smell of sheep, it will smell more like sulphur.

How ironic, at a time when this Pope decides that we should praise the filthy apostate Luther and his followers who believe in "sola scriptura" that this Pope, chooses to ignore Holy Scripture and instead, places himself above it. 


Given a choice between one or the other, I'll choose Paul of Tarsus over Bergoglio of Buenos Aires!